US Value Tilt
Value has historically outperformed growth over long periods. After a decade of growth dominance, valuations have compressed. This portfolio leans into cheap, profitable companies.
Holdings
| Symbol | Name | Weight | Price | 1D | 3M | YTD | Yield | AUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPYV | State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 35% | $57.72 | ... | ... | ... | 1.8% | $32.4B |
| SCHD | Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF | 25% | $30.57 | ... | ... | ... | 3.5% | $84.9B |
| IWD | iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 20% | $221.87 | ... | ... | ... | 1.6% | $72.6B |
| VBR | Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 20% | $224.80 | ... | ... | ... | 1.8% | $33.7B |
Investment Thesis
The value premium — the tendency of cheap stocks to outperform expensive ones — is one of the most studied phenomena in finance. From 1926 to 2023, US value stocks returned ~12% annualized vs ~10% for growth. But from 2010 to 2023, growth crushed value as tech dominated. The question is whether this is a permanent shift or a rubber band that will snap back. History suggests the latter: every extended period of growth dominance has eventually reversed. Value stocks today trade at historically wide discounts to growth, particularly in the small-cap space where VBR operates. SPYV provides large-cap value (Berkshire, JPMorgan, Johnson & Johnson), SCHD adds a quality/dividend screen, IWD captures the broad Russell 1000 Value, and VBR targets small-cap value — academically, the segment with the highest expected returns.
Portfolio Construction
Key Considerations
- Value has underperformed growth for over a decade — patience is required
- Value stocks can be 'cheap for a reason' — structurally challenged businesses in declining industries
- Small-cap value (VBR) is particularly volatile and can have long stretches of underperformance
- The definition of 'value' is subjective and may miss the next generation of great companies